Magic and masculinity in early modern English drama
The prevalent world-view of early modern England, clearly shaped by Protestantism, dismissed magical belief as an ideological delusion inherent in Catholicism. That same Protestantism encouraged a strong sense of individualism, with its emphasis on self-transformation, through which a new masculinity found expression. Why, then, did magical self-empowerment retain such a hold on the artistic and cultural imagination of early modern English society? Ian McAdam's innovative study suggests that the answer to this question may lie partly in an increasingly ironic presentation of magic. While the magical beliefs of the period asserted, on the one hand, individual empowerment through a quasi-religious self-justification and a presumed mastery of the objective world, those beliefs also gave rise to various anxieties concerning power and control -- anxieties that created difficulty with conceptions of masculine and feminine gender roles as well as cultural attitudes toward Nature and the natural. Thus, McAdam contends, the increased interest in magic was connected to a crisis in masculine identity, which was exacerbated by the Protestant Reformation and its concern with individual empowerment as well as class, sexual, and religious identifications. Moreover, as artistic presentations -- especially in the theatre -- were concerned with magic as a form of psychological. ideological, of cultural control, the study finds the psychoanalytic concept of narcissism useful in explaining the notion of selfhood as it developed in early modern England. In chapters that explore various literary texts, McAdam considers depictions of magic by tracing a chronological path that follows a dialectical struggle involving a precarious attempt to balance "supra'rational" and "sub-rational" impulses. Beginning with Greene's Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay, which depicts some ambivalent attitudes toward magical self-empowerment and the cultural concern of a feminine sexual threat to masculine (magical) control, the book moves to the Calvinist constructions of manhood in Marlowe's Doctor Faustus and eventually to considerations of male self-definition and its reliance on women, class considerations in more oblique magical contexts, and surrender to magical (and ideological) powers in the works of Shakespeare, Marston, Middleton, Chapman, and Jonson. In addition to appealing to those who study early modern literature and drama, this book will interest scholars of gender and those concerned with the theological basis of human subjectivity in the Renaissance.
54 pages matching tradition in this book
Results 1-3 of 54
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
One Sex and Magic in Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay
Two Puritan Magic in Doctor Faustus
10 other sections not shown
Actaeon argues artistic assertion audience Bacon become British Bruno Bussy Bussy D'Ambois Calvinist Cambridge centre characters Christopher Marlowe comedy comic Comus contemporary context critical cultural death demonic Dennis Potter Derek Walcott devil discourse divine Doctor Faustus drama dramatists dream early modern edited England English fact female Freud Friar Gardzienice gender genre Harold Pinter Harsnett Howard Brenton human Ibid identity ideological John Jonson King language literary literature London Lyman Macbeth magic male manliness Marlowe Marlowe's masculine means Milton moral Mount Morgan musical narcissistic National Theatre nature Neoplatonic Othello Oxford performance Pidgin Pinter play play's playwright political postmodern Prospero Protestant psychological Puritan radical reading reality religious Renaissance role satire scene Scottish seems sense sexual Shakespeare significant Singing Detective Skriker social society spiritual stage Stoppard suggests Syphax Tempest theatrical tion tradition University Press Walcott witchcraft witches women words writing York