The art of military coercion: why the West's military superiority scarcely matters
Since the end of the Cold War, liberal democracies have conducted military interventions on numerous occasions, and with mixed results. Why is it that these results have so often been poor? The main argument of this study is that to be succesful, force must be used decisively. This requires the right balance between means and ends, based on an understanding of the dynamics of coercion. But even if this is the case, asymmetrical reactions from a weak opponent could easily offset Western military might. This is why, this book argues, the Wests military superiority scarcely matters.
43 pages matching European in this book
Results 1-3 of 43
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
achieve adversary Afghanistan air campaign air power AirLand Battle al-Qaeda American areas argued armed forces attack attrition bombings Chechen chemical coalition coerce coercer coercive diplomacy collateral damage combat command concept conflict Consequently conventional counterinsurgency countries defense democratic doctrine effective enemy Europe European fight fighters foreign policy Gulf human rights humanitarian insurgents interoperability Iraq Islamic Kosovo leaders liberal democracies maneuver warfare manual mass destruction military coercion military force military interventions military operations Milosevic missiles modern NATO's North Korea nuclear weapons Operation Allied Force Operation Desert Storm Operation Enduring Freedom Operation Iraqi Freedom opponent option peace political objectives population post-modern President regime requires result risks Russian Saddam Hussein Security Council Serb Somalia Soviet Special Operations Forces stake strategic culture strategy success tactical Taliban target terrorism terrorists threat tion troops U.S. Army unconventional warfare United vital interests wars Warsaw Pact weapons of mass