The Idea of a Party System: The Rise of Legitimate Opposition in the United States, 1780-1840

Front Cover
University of California Press, 1969 - Political parties - 280 pages
4 Reviews
  

What people are saying - Write a review

Review: The Idea of a Party System: The Rise of Legitimate Opposition in the United States 1780-1840

User Review  - Kate - Goodreads

Detailed history of the first few presidents and party leaders in the United States... how Washington and others thought parties were "evil," and the subsequent changes to "necessary evil" and finally ... Read full review

Review: The Idea of a Party System: The Rise of Legitimate Opposition in the United States 1780-1840

User Review  - Tom Mackie - Goodreads

Not a bard burner and it gets weak toward the end and the origin of partys in the time of Jackson and Van Buren. Read full review

Contents

One Party and Opposition in the Eighteenth
1
Two A Constitution against Parties
40
Three The Jeffersonians in Opposition
74

Common terms and phrases

About the author (1969)

DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University from 1959 until the time of his death, Richard Hofstadter was one of the most influential historians in post--World War II America. His political, social, and intellectual histories raised serious questions about assumptions that had long been taken for granted and cast the American experience in an interesting new light. His 1948 work, The American Political Tradition, is an enduring classic study in political history. His 1955 work, The Age of Reform, which still commands respect among both historians and general readers, won him that year's Pulitzer Prize. A measure of Hofstadter's standing in literary and scholarly circles is the honors he received in 1964 for Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (1963)---Pulitzer Prize for general nonfiction, the Ralph Waldo Emerson Prize of Phi Beta Kappa, and the Sidney Hillman Prize Award. Hofstadter's greatest talent, however, may have been his ability to order complex events and issues and to synthesize from them a rational, constructively critical perspective on American history.

Bibliographic information