Program Evaluation: Methods and Case StudiesPosavac and Carey provide a comprehensive, but accessible, introduction to the field of program evaluation. By adopting a flexible philosophy of evaluation, the authors demonstrate how program evaluation can be applied to answer a wide variety of questions in many different settings. Enjoying widespread acceptance, Program Evaluation includes case studies of completed program evaluations and sketches of the careers of program evaluators to help readers develop an appreciation of the applicability of evaluation methods. By viewing program evaluation as a formalization of something that people do all the time and, indeed, find essential, the implicit threat of evaluation is reduced by the authors' approach. Posavac and Carey stress the importance of working with representatives of all groups affected by the program, whether they be program staff or managers, recipients, or people providing financial or moral support. The Improvement-Focused Model of Evaluation can be used to include many people in the evaluation process. The authors show that the application of program evaluation serves to contribute to making society more effective, just, and healthy. |
Contents
SINGLE GROUP NONEXPERIMENTAL OUTCOME | 8 |
PLANNING AN EVALUATION | 22 |
SELECTING CRITERIA AND SETTING STANDARDS | 42 |
Copyright | |
18 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
achievement administrators agency American Evaluation Association analysis answer approach asked assessment behavior chapter clients conduct control group cost-benefit analysis costs criteria described develop ethical eval evaluators seek examine example expected findings focus groups funds goals gram Head Start hindsight bias hospital human service ical impact implementation important improve internal evaluators internal validity interpretations interviews issues Leviton Lipsey managers measures ment mental health methods Newbury Park objectives observations organization outcome participant observer patients percent planners Posavac possible posttest pretest problems procedures program evaluation program participants program personnel program staff qualitative evaluation qualitative methods questions reliability require responsible selected served Sesame Street Shadish skills social specific sponsors staff members stakeholders statistical survey tests tion treatment Type II errors uation variables workfare