Deficit Hysteria: A Common Sense Look at America's Rush to Balance the Budget

Front Cover
Praeger, Jan 1, 1998 - Business & Economics - 149 pages
0 Reviews

The political consensus in the United States today is that the nation avoid deficit spending. But as virtuous and unassailable as that goal sounds, it has fallacies and dangers. In a lucid, nontechnical writing style, Benavie shows that deficits can be either good or bad and explains how to tell the difference. Deficits, or government borrowing, can be beneficial or harmful depending on what the government does with the money. Preventing such borrowing, Benavie points out, would be comparable to preventing one's family from borrowing money to buy a house or to put a child through college.

Deficits can be beneficial to the nation's economic health in three main ways. When the economy slumps, a deficit, which is automatically created, helps to reduce the severity of the recession. When the economy is seriously depressed, boosting the deficit may be the only cure. Finally, deficits to support such investments as basic research, cleaning up toxic waste, and rebuilding inner cities are crucial to the economic health of future generations.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

A Symbol of Evil in American Politics
15
The Deficit Resumes Its Evil Image
20
Jobs versus Inflation
27
Copyright

11 other sections not shown

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

All Book Search results »

About the author (1998)

ARTHUR BENAVIE is Professor of Economics at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.