Citizens, courts, and confirmations: positivity theory and the judgments of the American people
In recent years the American public has witnessed several hard-fought battles over nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court. In these heated confirmation fights, candidates' legal and political philosophies have been subject to intense scrutiny and debate. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations examines one such fight--over the nomination of Samuel Alito--to discover how and why people formed opinions about the nominee, and to determine how the confirmation process shaped perceptions of the Supreme Court's legitimacy. Drawing on a nationally representative survey, James Gibson and Gregory Caldeira use the Alito confirmation fight as a window into public attitudes about the nation's highest court. They find that Americans know far more about the Supreme Court than many realize, that the Court enjoys a great deal of legitimacy among the American people, that attitudes toward the Court as an institution generally don't suffer from partisan or ideological polarization, and that public knowledge enhances the legitimacy accorded the Court. Yet the authors demonstrate that partisan and ideological infighting that treats the Court as just another political institution undermines the considerable public support the institution currently enjoys, and that politicized confirmation battles pose a grave threat to the basic legitimacy of the Supreme Court.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
AAPOR abortion African Americans Alito confirmation Alito nomination analysis attitudes bivariate Caldeira and Gibson causal chapter citizens Clarence Thomas confirmation fight confirmation preferences confirmation process conservative controversial correlation Court support Cronbach's alpha democratic institutions democratic values dependent variable disagree effect election equation evaluations expectations exposure findings frame Gore hypothesis identify impact important indicators instance institutional legitimacy institutional loyalty institutional support institutions and processes interaction interview issues Judge Alito judicial judiciary law and courts legitimizing symbols mass public measure Model Mondak multicollinearity opinion oversample partisan partisanship party identification perceived percent percentage political institutions positivity bias predictors preexisting preme Court president questions Rehnquist relationship reports respondents role rule of law salient Samuel Alito Sandra Day O'Connor scores Senate Spence support for democratic survey Table tion U.S. Congress U.S. Presidential Election U.S. Supreme Court United States Supreme vote William Rehnquist