Ervin S. Armstrong, Et Al, Plaintiffs, Vs. Kettleman North Dome Association, a Corporation, Et Al, Defendants: Shell Oil Comapany, a Corporation, Et Al, Cross-complainants, Vs. Kettleman North Dome Association, a Corporation, Et Al, Cross-defendants. Opinion of the Court1938 - Petroleum law and legislation - 328 pages |
Common terms and phrases
6500 foot contour accumulation acreage acres anticline area of closure Avenal beds Blauvelt blue lands blue line board of directors Brown shale classify Coalinga contour maps contour on top corporation correlation court Couvering crestal Cretaceous cross-complainants demonstrated deposition depth deriving determine drilling dry holes Elsinore Eocene equity established evidence exploratory extrapolate facts faults feet field fixing the productive flank lands flank owners fold formations Galloway geologist horizon January 31 Kettleman Hills Kettleman North Dome knowledge Kreyenhagen Lillis-Welsh marginal ment miles Miocene non-productive northeast flank Note oil and gas oil-water interface opinion parcel participation peneplain penetrated periphery petroleum engineers position productive limits line productive sands proof Ralph Reed reason reclassification red line reservoir resolutions Schlumberger sediments Shell Oil Company signatories slicken smooth line southwest flank strata stratigraphic struc sub-surface sub-Temblor surface geology Temblor thickness tion unconformities unit agreement up-structure Vaqueros Whepley shale zones