Schopenhauer: A Consistent Reading

Front Cover
E. Mellen Press, 2003 - 205 pages
Dr. Neeley seriously regards Schopenhauer's remarks about the unity, harmony, and consistencey of his philosophy. He may even be said to take Schopenhauer's consistency claims more seriously than any other major interpreter of his thought. Dr. Neeley who is also a lawyer as well as a professor of philosophy, treats Schopenhauer as if he were a client charged with a capital offense for a philosopher, i.e., producing an inconsistent philosophy. The charge of inconsistency has been a demon haunting Arthur Schopenhauer's philosophy from the earliest critical reviews of his masterpiece, The World As Will and Representation, through the present. If one were to derive a conclusion regarding Schopenhauer's philosophy based on the dominant themes exemplified in the secondary literature, one may well infer that Schopenhauer's philosophy was the product of a brilliant, but radically flawed thinker. It would seem that Schopenhauer was capable of provocative ideas, flashes of isolated insights, which inspired some philosophers and many creative artists, but that his thought was saturated with irreconcilable paradoxes and contradictions, although this all was expressed in a clear and, at times,

From inside the book

Contents

The Knowledge and Nature
25
Chapter ThreeSchopenhauer and the Limits of Language
53
A Reconsideration
83
Copyright

5 other sections not shown

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2003)

G. Steven Neeley is a practicing Attorney-At-Law, Philosophical Psychotherapist, and Associate Professor of Philosophy at Saint Francis University

Bibliographic information