...contingent is also strongly expressed by Lord Brougham in Earl of Bipon v. Hobart, 3 Mylne & K. 169: "If the thing sought to be prohibited is in itself a nuisance, the court will interfere to stop irreparable mischief without waiting for the result of a trial. But where the thing sought to...

...Following the English rule, the Chancellor, in Mohawk Bridge Co. v. Utica & SR Co., 6 Paige, 563, said: "If the thing sought to be prohibited Is In Itself...court will Interfere to stay Irreparable mischief, where the complainant's right Is not doubtful, without waiting for the result of a trial. But where...

...ruinous or irreparable." 2 Story's Eq. 207. In Ripon v. Hobart, 3 Mylne & Keen, 169, Lord Brougham says: "If the thing sought to be prohibited is in itself...court •will interfere to stay irreparable mischief with508*] out 'waiting for the result of a trial; and will, according to the circumstances, direct...

...v. Lake, 54 M. 540, 28 Am. Rep. 378. § 19. Nuisances subject to abatement or injunction. (1839-43). If the thing sought to be prohibited is in Itself a nuisance a court of equity will Interfere, but where the thing sought to be restrained is not unavoidable and...

...The Principles Upon Which It Is Granted. These have been stated by Lord Brougham as follows : " Tf the thing sought to be prohibited is in itself a nuisance,...mischief, without waiting for the result of a trial; and will, according to the circumstances, direct an issue, or allow an action, and, if need be, expedite...

...stated by Lord Chancellor Brougham in the case of the Earl of Ripon v. Hobart, 3 Mylne & Keene 169, 179: "If the thing sought to be prohibited is in Itself...mischief, without waiting for the result of a trial ; and will, according to the circumstances, direct an Issue, or allow an action, and, if need be, expedite...

...or irreparable. (2 Story 'sEq.. 207.) In Itipon v. Hubart, 8 Mylne & Keen, 169, Lord Brougham says : "If the thing sought to be prohibited is in itself...court will interfere to stay irreparable mischief with<5O8*] out *waitiiig for the result of a trial; and will, according to the circumstances, direct...

...only where facts are contested; anJ cases of nuisance are exceptcd from the bencfH even of this rule. "If the thing sought to be prohibited is in itself a nuisance, the court «И interfere to stay irreparable mischief, without waiting the result of a trial." Shelford o" Railways,...

...in a recent case of the Earl of Risson v. Hobart, Cooper, Rep. (temp. Brougham,) 343. "If anything sought to be prohibited is in itself a nuisance, the...court will interfere to stay irreparable mischief, where the complainant's right is not doubtful, without waiting for the result of a trial. But where...

...Myl. & Keene, 169, respecting the exercise of the jurisdiction, have been here adopted. He said : " If the thing sought to be prohibited is in itself a nuisance, the court will interfere to stay irreparaVOL. LXVII. [Ogletree v. McQnaggs et al.] ble mischief without waiting for the result of a...