1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
angler average Bass & Trout bass fishing Big Game catch rate Census Regions Pacific contingent valuation contingent-valuation questions cost per trip deer hunting different from zero dummy variable East North Central East South economic value elk and moose England CT expenditures Explanatory Variables feeding wildlife Fish and Wildlife fishing trips Interval Estimation Lakes largemouth bass marginal value Middle Atlantic NJ moose hunting Mountain NA3 NA3 NA4 NA4 NA4 Ninety Percent Confidence North Central IA Plains IA Probit Equation Results reported because estimated Resident respondents significantly different South Atlantic South Central spotted bass striped bass trout fishing U.S. Bureau U.S. Fish valuation response value estimates Value not reported values per day walleye fishing Walleye Region West North West South Wildlife Service Regions wildlife watching willingness to pay