6th Conference on Law and Philosophy
Law Review Association of the Quinnipiac University School of Law, 2008 - Constitutional law - 186 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Can Constitutionalism be Leftist?
Constitutional Hardball and Constitutional
MultiValenced Constitutional Interpretation
4 other sections not shown
abortion Ackerman Amendment American arguing Australian Balkin Bernhard Bobbitt Bruce Ackerman Civil Rights claims commitment common law Common Law Constitutional Common Law Constitutionalism Constitution's text constitutional courts constitutional crisis constitutional hardball constitutional interpretation constitutional law constitutional order constitutionalism constitutionalist constraining critique decision-making decisions democracy democratic disagreement entrenchment example Fallon goals Harv hereinafter Hoover institutions interpretive approaches interpretive theories Jackson judgment judicial review Judith Resnik Justice Kenya Kenyatta Korematsu lawyers leftist legislative legitimacy legitimate Mann Mark Tushnet Marshall's Michael Seidman multi-valenced interpretation Noel Pearson normative original understandings party populist constitutionalism Posner practice precedent principles Professor of Law provides purpose question Quinnipiac Quinnipiac University reasons Roper rule of law slave slavery social sources stare decisis Strauss substantive suggests supra note supra note 19 Supreme Court Taking the Constitution thin constitution Thurgood Marshall U.S. Constitution University Vermeule Yorta Yorta Yorta