AEC Authorizing Legislation: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Legislation of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, Congress of the United States ... Congress ... Session on AEC Autorizing Legislation, 2. daļa
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
accelerator activity addition amount analysis applications Argonne Atomic Energy basic beam biological budget cavity Chairman chamber changes charge Commission Committee completion conducted considerable construction contamination continued cosmic ray cost crater determine device Division dose effects effort electron engineering equipment established estimated excavation expected experimental experiments exposure facility field fiscal funds future high energy physics important improved increase indicated industry interest isotopes Laboratory limited magnetic major materials measurements methods million National Laboratory natural neutron nuclear explosions obtained operation particles pattern planned Plowshare possible present problems processes proposed question radiation radioactive reactor reduced Representative requested responsibility result ring rock Rulison safety samples scientific Soviet storage studies Table tion underground United University various zone
616. lappuse - State and local governments, and other concerned public and private organizations, to use all practicable means and measures, including financial and technical assistance, in a manner calculated to foster and promote the general welfare, to create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist in productive harmony, and fulfill the social, economic, and other requirements of present and future generations of Americans.
717. lappuse - This book is one of a series prepared in connection with the Survey of the Behavioral and Social Sciences conducted between 1967 and 1969 under the auspices of the Committee on Science and Public Policy of the National Academy of Sciences and the Problems and Policy Committee of the Social Science Research Council.
626. lappuse - Treaty, under appropriate international observation and through appropriate international procedures, potential benefits from any peaceful applications of nuclear explosions will be made available to non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty on a nondiscriminatory basis and that the charge to such Parties for the explosive devices used will be as low as possible and exclude any charge for research and development.
1111. lappuse - Agency action made reviewable by statute and final agency action for which there is no other adequate remedy in a court are subject to judicial review.
1114. lappuse - The ones with which we are most concerned in these cases are tritium and krypton 85. Prior to flaring the AEC is unable to determine the exact distribution of the critical radionuclide tritium among the various cavity gases. However, at the trial, Dr. Alfred Holzer testified at length on the tritium distribution in cavity gas. Dr. Holzer is a physicist at the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory of the University of California at Livermore, California, where he is a Deputy Division Leader. He was the Project...
594. lappuse - Each Party to the Treaty undertakes to take appropriate measures to ensure that, in accordance with this Treaty, under appropriate international observation and through appropriate international procedures, potential benefits from any peaceful applications of nuclear explosions will be made available to non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty...
894. lappuse - ... transportation and other expenses of its scientists and personnel accompanying them to their destination and return, as well as within the host country. The host country will be responsible for making suitable arrangements such as hotel accommodation and travel, and for providing necessary interpreters.
1111. lappuse - generous review provisions' must be given a 'hospitable' interpretation. Again in Rusk v Cort, [369 US 367, 379-380, 7 L Ed 2d 809, 82 S Ct 787 (1967),] the Court held that only upon a showing of 'clear and convincing evidence' of a contrary legislative intent should the courts restrict access to judicial review.