A Cross-linguistic Comparison of the Acquisition of Why-questions by Young Children

Front Cover
GRIN Verlag, Jul 29, 2007 - 92 pages
0 Reviews
Thesis (M.A.) from the year 2006 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: sehr gut (1.0), Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg (Seminar fur Anglistik), 56 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Since Labov and Labov 1978 it is known that English-speaking children do not apply Subject Auxiliary Inversion uniformly across question types. In particular, inversion in why-questions still occurs at the low rate of 15% between 4;0 and 4;6. Recently Thornton (2004) suggested that non-inversion in why-questions is due to the fact that why occupies a position different and higher than other wh-words. In this view leaving why-questions uninverted is an option available in UG as in Italian (Rizzi 1999). Rowland and Pine 2000 investigating 6 types of wh-questions corroborate the findings of Labov and Labov (1978). In contrast to Thornton, they explain the non-occurrence of inversion in why-questions in a constructivist framework by the low frequency of input. In Germanic languages different from English, question formation does not only involve SAI but requires subject verb inversion for all verb types, whereas English requires do-support for main verbs. This property is due to verb-movement, namely V2. In these languages main verbs can raise to a position in the left periphery where the Wh-feature can be checked. In particular, a generative approach would predict for Germanic languages like German or Danish that children who have acquired the V2 property do not have difficulties with inversion in all questions types. A usage-based approach, however, would predict an input-dependent acquisition of inversion for every single question type since it is claimed that children do not use general operations or categories such as wh-elements. This study investigates the spontaneous production of questions in two German children with an age range of 3;1-3;7 and one Danish child with an age range of 1;00-6;1. The analysis s"
 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Table of Contents
5
The delayed acquisition of whyquestions 9 4 Predictions
16
Method 24 5 1 Danish 24 5 2 German 25 5 3 Classification of Danish and German
26
Discussion 40 8 1 The CPmodifier Hypothesis
40
Conclusion 78 11 References
81
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 81 - Clahsen, H., C. Kursawe and M. Penke: 1995, 'Introducing CP: Wh-Questions and Subordinate Clauses in German Child Language', Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 7, 1-28.
Page 20 - Wessen Buch glaubst du wessen Buch Hans liest? 'Whose book do you think whose book Hans is reading?
Page 15 - Reidun, already has this knowledge while his sister is still missing it. (13) RUNE: Why do you put the telephone on the front seat? REIDUN: Yes.
Page 20 - Wer glaubst du wer nach Hause geht? 'Who do you think who goes home)' However, in these German dialects, no complex wh-phrases are allow in the intermediate CP as in the ungrammatical (19).

Bibliographic information