What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
act of Congress action affirmed alleged allowed amount appeal application authority award Bank bill of exceptions bring brought cause certified Circuit Court claimed Constitution controversy counsel Cranch decided decision decree defendant directed discretion dismissed District Court entered equity evidence examination execution exercise facts favor federal filed final final decree final judgment finding give given grant ground Held highest court inferior court interest issue judge judgment judicial Judiciary Act jurisdiction jury land Louisiana mandamus March ment motion opinion original Otto party passed person petition plaintiff plea pleadings practice presented proceedings proper provisions question Railroad raised record refused rendered reverse revise rule statute sufficient suit Supreme Court taken term territory tion treaty trial twenty-fifth section United unless validity Wall whole writ of error
Page 255 - A final judgment or decree in any suit, in the highest court of law or equity of a State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under the United States, and the decision is against their validity...
Page 194 - State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under the United States, and the decision is against their validity; or where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under any State, on the ground of their being repugnant to the constitution, treaties or laws of the United States...
Page 182 - States, and the decision is in favor of such, their validity ; or where is drawn in question the construction of any clause of the Constitution, or of a treaty, or statute of, or commission held under the United States, and the decision is against the title, right, privilege, or exemption specially let up or claimed by either party, under such clause of the said Constitution, treaty, statute, or commission, may be reexamined and reversed or affirmed in the Supreme Court of the United States upon...
Page 1 - That the Supreme Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction of all controversies of a civil nature, where a state is a party, except between a state and its citizens; and except also between a state and citizens of other states, or aliens, in which latter case it shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction.
Page 248 - States, in the same manner and under the same regulations, and the writ shall have the same effect, as if the judgment or decree complained of had been rendered or passed in a circuit court...
Page 8 - States authorizes the supreme court " to issue writs of mandamus, in cases warranted by the principles and usages of law, to any courts appointed, or persons holding office, under the authority of the United States.
Page 157 - Writs of error, and appeals from the final decisions of said supreme court, shall be allowed, and may be taken to the .supreme court of the United States, in the same manner and under the same regulations as from the circuit courts of the United States...
Page 365 - Court then next ensuing. 2. When the death of a party is suggested, and the representatives of the deceased...
Page 379 - INTEREST. 1. In cases where a writ of error is prosecuted in this court and the judgment of the inferior court is affirmed, the interest shall be calculated and levied, from the date of the judgment below until the same is paid, at the same rate that similar judgments bear interest in the courts of the State * where such judgment was rendered.