A Good Quarrel: America's Top Legal Reporters Share Stories from Inside the Supreme Court
While reading what top legal reporters say about some of the most important U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments in recent history, go to www.goodquarrel.com to listen to audio and hear for yourself the very style and delivery of the oral arguments that have shaped the history of our nation's highest law. See Preface for full instructions.
Charles Bierbauer, CNN Lyle Denniston, scotusblog.com Fred Graham, Court TV Brent Kendall, Los Angeles Daily Journal Steve Lash, Houston Chronicle Dahlia Lithwick, Slate.com Tony Mauro, American Lawyer Media Tim O'Brien, ABC News David Savage, Los Angeles Times Greg Stohr, Bloomberg News Nina Totenberg, NPR
Timothy R. Johnson teaches in the Department of Political Science and the Law School at the University of Minnesota.
Jerry Goldman teaches political science at Northwestern University and directs the OYEZ Project, a multimedia archive devoted to the Supreme Court, at www.oyez.org.
Cover sketch by Dana Verkouteren
"Supreme Court oral arguments are good government in action. A Good Quarrel brilliantly showcases this important aspect of the Court's work."
---Paul Clement, Partner, King & Spalding, and former United States Solicitor General
"Few legal experiences are as exhilarating as a Supreme Court oral argument---a unique art form that this superb collection brings vividly to life."
---Kathleen Sullivan, Partner, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver and Hedges, and former Dean, Stanford Law School
"[A Good Quarrel] shines a brilliant spotlight on the pivotal moment of advocacy when the Supreme Court confronts the nation's most profound legal questions."
---Thomas C. Goldstein, Partner, Akin Gump, and Lecturer, Supreme Court Litigation, Harvard Law School and Stanford Law School
"A brilliant way to understand America's most important mysterious institution."
---Lawrence Lessig, Stanford Law School
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Elk Grove Unified School District v Newdow
Forsyth County Georgia v the Nationalist Movement
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey
Bush v Gore
Glickman v Wileman Brothers and Elliott Inc
Grutter v Bollinger
Chandler v Miller
Rapanos v United States
Other editions - View all
abortion advertising advocates af‹rmative Amendment Antonin G argued asked attorney Barrett Berzon Bopp brief Bush Campagne candidates chandler chief justice rehnquist chief justice roberts Circuit Clarence Thomas Clement Congress constitutional contribution limits Corps Court of Appeals courtroom de‹ne drug election fact federal Florida Supreme Court Forsyth County Georgia Gerawan going government’s Guilday Honor Hopper interest issue Jaspan jenkins John Paul Stevens Justice Antonin Justice Breyer justice ginsburg justice kennedy justice o’connor justice scalia justice souter justice stevens Kolbert Kolbo lawyers listen to passages Mahoney marketing McConnell ment nation’s navigable waters Newdow Nixon of‹ce of‹cer of‹cials Olson opinion oral argument oral arguments indicated passages from oral political preate problem protection quali‹cation question Rapanos regulate ruling signi‹cant nexus Sorrell speci‹c state’s statute Stubbs there’s tion tributary U.S. Supreme Court Vermont visit www.goodquarrel.com vote wetlands women