A Laboratory Investigation of the Effectiveness of Two Industrial Supervisory Patterns |
Contents
Differential Effectiveness of the Styles A Theoretical | 8 |
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE | 16 |
Subjects | 40 |
2 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
analysis of variance Appendix asked the Ss attitudes Authoritarianism of Subordinates Autocrat Sup autocratic supervision autocratically-led groups behavior Chapter characteristics Cornell University correlation Democrat Sup democratic style democratic supervision democratically-led groups dependent variables differences differential effectiveness discussed erector sets experiment experimental design experimental sessions F-ratio F-scale F-test Factors significantly related farm carts female Ss given goal High-F Ss identified through Summary inasmuch individuals instructed laboratory leader leadership style likable Lippitt and White Low scores indicate Low-F Ss main effect manipulation mean measure mediating variables moderating variables needs observed perceived strictness post-experimental interview predicted present investigation productivity criterion questionnaire reported role sample satisfaction scores indicate high seems self-actualization Self-Direction Sex of Subordinates significant specific standard scores statistical structure style dimension Style of Supervision style played subassemblies subsamples Summary ANOV Table SUMMARY TABLE super supervisory style task tion Type II error