What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Police Interrogation and the Supreme Court
Individual Freedom Due Process and Miranda
An Opportunity for Upgrading Police Standards
15 other sections not shown
accused admissibility apply arrest California Chief Justice circumstances client co-defendant confession constitutional rights conviction Course Handbook Court of Appeals crime criminal custodial interrogation decided defendant defendant's dence derivative evidence rule dissenting district attorney doctrine due process Escobedo and Miranda exclusionary rule fact federal fession Fifth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment fruit GILMORE give given going ICLE illegal inadmissible incriminating John Van Voorhis Johnson jury juvenile court KAMISAR KAVANAGH law enforcement lawyer Lynch Massachusetts rule matter ment Michigan Law School Miranda decision Miranda warnings Nedrud obtained opinion person PIERSANTE plea bargaining poisonous tree police departments police interrogation police officers police practices police station prisoner problem procedure Professor prosecution protect question REED retroactivity right to counsel search and seizure self-incrimination statement suggest Supreme Court suspect terrogation testify testimony tion trial judge UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE United States Supreme University of Michigan Volume voluntariness waive waiver witness