A comparison of students and community participants as jurors in a simulated child sexual abuse trial
Peter K. Isquith, L. Matthew Duggan, Murray Levine, Baldy Center for Law and Social Policy (Buffalo, N.Y.), State University of New York at Buffalo. Dept. of Psychology. Child Clinical Psychology and Law Program
Baldy Center for Law & Social Policy, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1989 - Law - 27 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
actual jurors alleged victim attribution of responsibility Bray Child Adult child corroborating child sex abuse child sexual abuse community jurors voted community mock jurors Community Participant Jurors community subjects Comparing Students Comparison of Students Condition None Child courtroom decision defendant's actions defendant's guilt dependent measure differences between students Doherty Duggan external validity following deliberations Forston found that students generalizability Gerbasi group verdicts independent variables individual votes interaction Jurors Corroboration Condition jurors voted guilty jury research jury simulation studies Kalven Kessler Konecni and Ebbesen length of deliberation Likert scale ln addition MANOVA Miller misinterpreted the defendant's Nemeth non-students potential jurors questionnaire Realism statements reasonable doubt standard reasonable doubt statements required for deliberation sentence the defendant sexual abuse trial Smeltzer standard of proof students and community students community students students jury pool subject type suggest that students type of juror unanimous guilty verdicts unanimous verdicts videotaped trial Weiten Zeisel