A comparison of three types of work activity statements in terms of the consistency of job information reported by incumbents
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Experimental Types of Statements
Combinations of Scales and Order of Assembly
6 other sections not shown
activity statements administration AFSC Air Force analyses of variance ANOV APPENDIX A Continued bolts check lists Coefficient Statistic Coefficient computed differ significantly difficulty scales DSdV Duty engine job equidment experimental frequency of performance frequency reporting period frequency scale given activity group of subjects hand wrench individual inter-rater agreement inter-rater consistency inter-rater reliability Jet Engine job analysis job incumbents job information Mean Mean Inter-Rater mental difficulty non-supervisors number of statements Occupational Research Questionnaire occurrence statistic otop Periodic inspection personal data Personnel physical difficulty position types Purdue University qualitative scales quantitative radar job rater consistency reliability of scale reported more consistently samples scale categories scale responses squadron St X R Table continued tamit tasks and elements test-retest reliability three types training desired training received transformed transmitter power output tXde type of training types of statements Unscrews values voltage regulator Xour