A conflict of rights: the Supreme Court and affirmative action
In a case that triggered cover stories in both Time and Newsweek, obscure Diane Joyce won over equally obscure Paul Johnson in the Supreme C ourt decision affirming Joyce's selection over Johnson as a road dispatcher, despite Johnson's slightly higher test scores. Urofsky's defense of affirmative action offers a view of a fairer, more productive society. 16 photographs.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Diane Joyce Makes a Phone Call
The Debate over Affirmative Action
The Law and Affirmative Action
10 other sections not shown
affirmative action plan affirmative action programs Agency's Antonin Scalia applied attorney Bakke basis believed Blackmun blacks Brennan brief California Charles Fried Chief Justice civil rights claim concurring Congress Connie Brooks Constitution county's Court of Appeals decision Diane Joyce discriminatory dispatcher's dissent district court EEOC employment equal equal-protection facie fact federal filed firm gender goals Graebner groups hiring Interview issue James Dawson job categories Judge Ingram labor force Lewis Powell majority mative action minorities and women Ninth Circuit O'Connor opinion oral argument past discrimination Paul Johnson percent percentage petitioner position Powell preferential prior discrimination promotion public employer qualified question quotas race racial Reagan Rehnquist remedy road dispatcher Sandra Day O'Connor Santa Clara County Scalia seniority Sermersheim Skilled Craft statistical imbalance statute Steven Woodside strict scrutiny suit Supreme Court Title VII Transportation Agency trial union Vaksdal violate vote wanted Weber white males woman workers Wygant