What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Page 28 - ... the person so accused, and that he or his counsel or attorney had a full opportunity of cross-examining the witness, then if such deposition purport to be signed by the Justice by or before whom the same purports to have been taken, it shall be lawful to read such deposition as evidence in such prosecution without further proof thereof, unless it shall be proved that such deposition was not in fact signed by the Justice purporting to sign the same.
Page 28 - Justices shall have full power and authority to do, and if upon the trial of the person so accused as first aforesaid it shall be proved by the oath or affirmation of any credible witness that any person whose deposition shall have been taken as aforesaid is dead or so ill as not to be able to travel...
Page 8 - Il aura la police de l'audience. — 181, 310s., 341, 504s. 268. Le président est investi d'un pouvoir discrétionnaire, en vertu duquel il pourra prendre sur lui tout ce qu'il croira utile pour découvrir la vérité ; et la loi charge son honneur et sa conscience d'employer tous ses efforts pour en favoriser la manifestation.
Page 28 - ... that any person whose deposition shall have been taken as aforesaid is dead, or so ill as not to be able to travel, and if also it be proved that such deposition was taken in the presence of the person so accused, and that he or his...
Page 39 - Bp. 325. §-a következőleg szabályozza : <>A bíróság semmiség terhe alatt nem tehet ítélete tárgyává oly tettet, mely miatt a vádló vádat nem emelt. Sem a tett minősítése, sem a büntetés kiszabása tekintetében nincs a törvényszék a vádló indítványához kötve*.