A Man of One Book?: John Wesley's Interpretation and Use of the Bible

Front Cover
Paternoster, 2007 - Religion - 230 pages
1 Review
John Wesley claimed to be a man of one book and early Wesley scholarship accepted uncritically that the Bible was his supreme authority. In the late twentieth-century American Wesley scholars discussed what has been termed the Wesley Quadrilateral (the authority of the Bible, tradition, reason and experience) and this to some extent does help explain the method by which Wesley read and interpreted the Bible. However, modern biblical reader-response criticism has drawn attention to the central role of the reader in his/her interpretation of scriptural texts. Donald Bullen argues that Wesley came to the Bible as a reader with the presuppositions of an eighteenth century High Church, Arminian Anglican, in which tradition he had grown up. He then found his beliefs confirmed in the scriptural text. Claiming to base all his beliefs on the Bible, he found himself in controversy with others who made similar claims but came to different conclusions. The implications of this are explored in depth.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

LibraryThing Review

User Review  - whoizme8 - LibraryThing

Bullen has done us a great service in this book. Wesley claimed to be a man of one book and Bullen seeks to know what this really means. In his search he finds that Wesley, like anyone else, is a man ... Read full review

Contents

The Formation of the Mainstream Tradition
10
Conclusions Concerning the Influence
26
American Wesley Scholarship in the Years Subsequent
40
Copyright

16 other sections not shown

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2007)

Donald A. Bullen is a Methodist minister who was ordained in 1959. He is interested in the origins of the Methodist Church. Following retirement in 1997 he undertook serious academic research, including his doctoral thesis on John Wesley and the way in which he interpreted and read the Bible. He is firmly committed to the ecumenical movement.

Bibliographic information