What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Introduction A Purposes of the Model System
jcw A MODEL PEER REVIEW SYSTEM
B The Problem of Attorney Incompetence
23 other sections not shown
admission AICPA applicable appropriate assure ATTORNEY COMPETENCE audit Bar Association Board Bronx certification client competence review concurrent review conduct Conference continuing legal education correction cost court CPA Firms criteria and standards criteria sets delegation determine diagnosis District Draft effective engagement established Ethics firm's GORAN HOSPITAL REVIEW SYSTEM hysterectomies identified improve incompetence initial Kern County law practice lawyer legal profession legal services length of stay matters MCE studies Medicaid medical audit medical care evaluation Medicare ment MODEL PEER REVIEW monitoring Montgomery County organization participate patient PEER REVIEW SYSTEM performance personnel physician pneumococcal pneumonia policies and procedures practitioners problem Procedural Knowledge profes Professional Responsibility profile analysis proposed PSRO hospital review PSRO program quality control policies referred attorney remedial Report require review coordinator review program screening Section selected specific staff tion torney Twenty Per Cent utilization York County