A safeguards case study of the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation uranium processing plant, Apollo, Pennsylvania: main report, Volume 88
Willard Altman, John Hockert, Elizabeth Quinn, United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. Division of Safeguards
Division of Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1980 - Science - 92 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
1979 NRC requirements accountability measurements accounting program AEC contract AEC lease AEC safeguards requirements Altman armed assault considered deficiencies control and accounting Corporation Uranium Processing current NRC regulatory current NRC requirements Deficiencies The review deficiencies under 1979 Division of Safeguards documentation failure to meet financial responsibility held under AEC Hockert Honorable Morris insufficient to meet inventory differences Leave blank main report Materials and Equipment meet current NRC meet current requirements mid-1960s disclosed nuclear facility Nuclear Material Safety Nuclear Regulatory Commission NUMBER NUMEC Apollo facility NUMEC physical NUMEC safeguards program NUMEC uranium processing NUMECs material control NUMECs response forces Office of Nuclear Pennsylvania Executive Summary physical barriers physical inventories physical protection program physical protection requirements plant in Apollo procedures in place program at NUMEC Regulatory Commission Washington Safeguards Case Study safeguards system Safety and Safeguards SNM held special nuclear material specific areas systems and procedures U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Udall uranium processing plant