A Third Way?: A European Perspective on the Child Protection/family Support Debate : Report of a Workshop on 18th/19th January 1996 Convened by the NSPCC and Brunel University College Social Work DepartmentThis work comprises a report of a workshop convened by the NSPCC and Brunel University Social Work Department to consider European approaches to child protection and family support. |
Contents
INTRODUCTION | 1 |
THE WORKSHOP THEMES DEBATES PROCESSES | 7 |
KEY CONCEPTS IN UNDERSTANDING | 17 |
Copyright | |
2 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
Administrative Protection adversarial system AEMO Andrew Cooper ASE service assessment assumptions autonomy Brunel University College child abuse child protection process child protection register child protection system children and families children and young children in need children's judge children's services concern context continental countries Continental practitioners continental systems Continental workers Council court culture debate decision discussion DISS emergency England English child protection English participants English system European experience family centres family support father federal feedback felt Flanders Flemish Flemish community France French Germany individual Inspecteur intervention involved judicial Jugendamt juvenile justice KJHG Koblenz legislation Maria Mediation Commission Messages From Research mother NSPCC offers parents policy formation policy makers political principle procedures professional judgement referred reflect relationship responsibility role social service social work service statutory structure subsidiarity Tavistock Clinic themes thinking Véronique voluntary agencies welfare Wendy Rose workshop