What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
agreed agreement Alabama Claims appeal appointed arising between Nations Articles of Confederation attack Britain cause Chief Justice citizens Civil Colony of Connecticut commonwealths Constitution contest controversy decided degrees thirty minutes differences divided Dred Scott edited eleventh amendment existence family of Nations favor Federal Government Federal Supreme Court force France frontier Geneva Tribunal Georgia Hague Peace Conference human Inter-State Court interests International Courts named international judicial international justice International Tribunals James Buchanan Jersey John Bassett Moore John Rutledge Journal of Congress judges judicial decisions judicial judgments judicial settlement jurisdiction King in Council land legislative Louisiana Massachusetts matter ment Michigan Missouri Compromise Municipal Courts named ad hoc ninth article North American Union Olmstead opinion Pennsylvania Philadelphia possession result Rhode Island Second Hague Peace settled slave slavery sovereign sovereignty submitted Supreme Court Reports Supreme Federal Tribunal territory thirteen thirty-six degrees thirty tion United States Supreme Volume VII Wisconsin York
Page 25 - ... or executive authority of the other State in controversy, and a day assigned for the appearance of the parties by their lawful agents, who shall then be directed to appoint, by joint consent, commissioners or judges to constitute a court for hearing and determining the matter in question...
Page 102 - ... composed of judges who are judicial officers and nothing else, who are paid adequate salaries, who have no other occupation, and who will devote their entire time to the trial and decision of international causes by judicial methods and under a sense of judicial responsibility. These judges should be so selected from the different countries that the different systems of law and procedure and the principal languages shall be fairly represented.
Page 102 - It should be your effort to bring about in the Second Conference a development of The Hague Tribunal into a permanent tribunal composed of judges who are judicial officers and nothing else, who are paid adequate salaries, who have no other occupation, and who will devote their entire time to the trial and decision of international causes by judicial methods and under a sense of judicial responsibility.
Page 39 - To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing, if these limits may at any time be passed by those intended to be restrained ? The distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed, and if acts prohibited and acts allowed are of equal obligation.
Page 81 - So in this case. As Scott was a slave when taken into the State of Illinois by his owner, and was there held as such, and brought back in that character, his status, as free or slave, depended on the laws of Missouri, and not of Illinois.
Page 120 - If the matter in controversy is important, so that defeat is a serious blow to the credit or the power of the litigant who is worsted, that interest becomes a more or less keen partisanship. According to their sympathies, men wish for the victory of one side or another. Such conflicting sympathies interfered most formidably with the choice of an impartial arbitrator.
Page 101 - If there could be a tribunal which would pass upon questions between nations with the same impartial and impersonal judgment that the Supreme Court of the United States gives to questions arising between citizens of the different States, or between foreign citizens and the citizens of the United States, there can be no doubt that nations would be much more ready to submit their controversies to its decision than they are now to take the chances of arbitration.
Page 39 - The Constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and like other acts is alterable when the Legislature shall please to alter it. If the former part of the alternative be true, then a legislative act contrary to the Constitution is not law; if the latter part be true, then written Constitutions are absurd attempts on the part of the people to limit a power in its own nature illimitable.
Page 28 - We are unanimously of Opinion that the State of Connecticut has no right to the Lands in controversy. "We are also unanimously of Opinion that the Jurisdiction and Preemption of all the Territory lying within the Charter boundary of Pennsylvania and now claimed by the State of Connecticut do of Right belong to the State of Pennsylvania.
Page 40 - Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.