Abandonment of the private right of action for aiding and abetting securities fraud/staff report on private securities litigation: hearing before the Subcommittee on Securities of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Third Congress, second session, on recent securities law decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court, Central Bank of Denver vs. First Interstate Bank of Denver ... May 12, 1994, Volume 4
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
THURSDAY MAY 12
Goldman partner McDermott Will Emery
7 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
abetting liability accounting firms accounting profession action for aiding aiders and abettors aiding and abetting alleged attorneys audit auditors Bank of Denver cause of action cent Central Bank decision Chairman civil class members clients Committee companies concerns Congress corporate counsel Court's decision damages decision in Central defendants defrauded investors Denver decision directors disclosure Exchange Commission Federal securities laws fees filed frivolous litigation Hearing Record impose insider trading issue lawsuits lawyers legislation Metzenbaum million NASAA parties percent person plaintiffs primary violator private actions private litigation private plaintiffs private rights private securities litigation professional question recovery remedies response right of action RUDER Rule 11 scienter SEC's secondary liability Section 10(b Securities and Exchange securities class action securities fraud securities markets Senator DODD Senator DOMENICI Senator GRAMM settle settlement shareholders standard statement statute of limitations Subcommittee suits supra note Supreme Court testimony vexatious litigation