Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings
Ken Hyland, Giuliana Diani
Palgrave Macmillan, Sep 15, 2009 - Language Arts & Disciplines - 256 pages
This book explores how academics publically evaluate each others work. Focusing on blurbs, book reviews, review articles, and literature reviews, the international contributors to the volume show how writers manage to critically engage with others ideas, argue their own viewpoints, and establish academic credibility.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Reviewing Science in an InformationOverloaded World
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Academic Book Reviews Academic Discourse Academic Writing adjectives adverbs analysis Applied Linguistics appraisal argue argument Bhatia blurbs Bondi book blurbs book review articles British British National Corpus catchphrase caveolae cent chapter citation claim clause context corpora corpus Corpus Linguistics course books critical comments cultural Disciplinary Discourses disciplines discourse community discussion Economics English studies epistemological evaluative acts example explicit Female frequency function Gea-Valor gender grammar hedges history BRs HistRev Hunston Hyland identified interaction issues Journal keywords knowledge language lexical literature review LitRev male markedness Moreno and Suarez Motta-Roth Move negative evaluation nouns occurrences patterns phraseologies phrases positive and negative positive evaluation present published readers realizations reference reporting verbs research articles review genres reviewed book rhetorical rhetorical structure role Salager-Meyer Science sequences shows Spanish BRs specific suggest Swales Table tacit knowledge texts textual thesis Thompson tion University of Reading values variation words