Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management
Deborah G. Mayo, Rachelle D. Hollander
Oxford University Press, Feb 17, 1994 - Science - 305 pages
Discussions of science and values in risk management have largely focused on how values enter into arguments about risks, that is, issues of acceptable risk. Instead this volume concentrates on how values enter into collecting, interpreting, communicating, and evaluating the evidence of risks, that is, issues of the acceptability of evidence of risk. By focusing on acceptable evidence, this volume avoids two barriers to progress. One barrier assumes that evidence of risk is largely a matter of objective scientific data and therefore uncontroversial. The other assumes that evidence of risk, being "just" a matter of values, is not amenable to reasoned critique. Denying both extremes, this volume argues for a more constructive conclusion: understanding the interrelations of scientific and value issues enables a critical scrutiny of risk assessments and better public deliberation about social choices. The contributors, distinguished philosophers, policy analysts, and natural and social scientists, analyze environmental and medical controversies, and assumptions underlying views about risk assessment and the scientific and statistical models used in risk management.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accident agencies air toxic argument cancer carcinogenic causal cause chapter chemical claim clinical trials concerns consequences controversy Covello criticism cultural relativists decision decision problem decision theory discussion DOE’s dose Douglas and Wildavsky effects environment environmental epidemiological ethical evaluation example experts exposure factors Fischhoff formaldehyde Giere groups hazards human impacts individual industry issues Kasperson knowledge Lichtenstein ment metascientific methodological moral responsibility naive positivists NAS–NRC National nuclear power nuclear waste NWPA objective options outcome philosophical policymakers political pollution population position possible Press probabilistic probabilistic causation probability problem procedures quantitative risk question Radioactive Waste reasons regulation regulatory relevant repository Risk Analysis risk assessment Risk Communication risk comparisons risk estimates risk judgments risk management Ruckelshaus scientific evidence scientists significant Slovic social society sociological view standards statistical studies technical Technology theory Todhunter uncertainty understanding Yucca Mountain