Acceptable evidence: science and values in risk management
Deborah G. Mayo, Rachelle D. Hollander
Oxford University Press, Nov 14, 1991 - Business & Economics - 292 pages
Discussions of science and values in risk management have largely focussed on the entry of values in judging risks, that is, issues of acceptable risk. This volume instead concentrates on the entry of values in collecting, interpreting, communicating, and evaluating the evidence of risks, that is, issues of the acceptability of evidence of risk. By focusing on acceptable evidence, this volume avoids two barriers to progress: views that assume that evidence of risk is largely a matter of objective scientific data and therefore uncontroversial, and views that assume that evidence of risk is ineluctably a matter of values and therefore not amenable to reasoned critique. This volume denies both extremes. It argues for a more constructive conclusion: that understanding the interrelations of scientific with value issues enables a critical scrutiny of risk assessments. This volume analyzes environmental and medical controversies, and assumptions underlying views about risk assessment and the scientific and statistical models used in risk management. Contributors include philosophers, policy analysts, and natural and social scientists.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Acceptable Evidence in a Pluralistic Society
Guidelines for Communicating Information About Chemical Risks
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
accident agencies air toxic argument cancer carcinogenic causal cause chapter chemical claim clinical trials concerns consequences controversy Covello criticism cultural relativists decision decision problem decision theory discussion dose Douglas and Wildavsky effects environment environmental epidemiological ethical evaluation example experts exposure fact factors Fischhoff formaldehyde Giere groups hazards human impacts individual industry issues Kasperson knowledge Lichtenstein ment metascientific methodological moral responsibility naive positivists nuclear power nuclear waste NWPA objective options outcome philosophical policymakers political pollution population position possible Press probabilistic probabilistic causation probability problem procedures quantitative risk question Radioactive Waste rationality reasons regulation regulatory relevant repository Risk Analysis risk assessment Risk Communication risk comparisons risk estimates risk judgments risk management Ruckelshaus scientific evidence scientists significant Slovic social society sociological view standards statistical studies technical Technology theory Todhunter uncertainty understanding University Yucca Mountain