Accountability in Restorative Justice
In reviving the idea of an informal approach to conflict resolution, the Restorative Justice movement attempts to break out of the predominantly punitive thinking which shapes modern criminal justice. Its proponents claim that its guiding ideals - personalism, participation, reparation, andreintegration - deliver a fairer, more effective, and more humane justice than does the court system. However, a simplistic tendency both to extol the virtues of restorative justice and to denigrate all conventional formal approaches risks blinding enthusiasts to the dangers inherent in uncheckedparticipant power, as well as to the protection which state institutions and professionals can provide to individuals and communities. The procedural safeguard of institutional accountability helps reduce these dangers. Examining the experiences of 25 programmes in six countries, Accountability in Restorative Justice uncovers a number of neglected, overlapping, and incomplete types of accountability, including the informal typebuilt into deliberations between victims and offenders and their supporters. This deliberative accountability can provide a rigorous check for regulating decision-making, holding state agencies accountable, and monitoring the completion of agreements reached between participants. This book also considers the role played by formal types of accountability, such as external review. It suggests a new approach, in which judges become more involved in monitoring the quality of deliberation in restorative justice conferences than with enforcing traditional sentencing principles.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Meaning of Restorative Justice and Accountability
Methods and Overview of Programmes
Deliberative Accountability in Restorative Meetings
Multiple Uses of Deliberative Accountability
The Role of Traditional Accountability
Other editions - View all
Aboriginal accountability mechanisms actions agreement allow alternative forum approach argues Australia Australian Federal Police Canberra Carcross commitments Community Conferencing community volunteers conference conferencing programme convened convenors court crime criminal justice system decision decision-making process deliberative accountability ensure example Family Group Conferencing form of accountability grammes important indigenous informal justice internal review investigating officer involved John Braithwaite judges Juvenile Justice Minnesota Correctional Facility modes of accountability monitoring Navajo Nation Navajo Peacemaking number of programmes observers offender's open justice outcome participants parties Paul Restorative Justice person police officer practice principles problem programme staff programmes surveyed prosecutors Queensland reconvened referred reintegration reintegrative shaming responsibility Restorative Justice Council restorative justice meetings restorative justice programmes restorative meetings role says scrutinizing South St Paul South Wales supporters Terry O'Connell Thames Valley Police tion tive justice Toronto Community Council Victim/Offender victims and offenders Wagga Wagga young offenders Youth Justice Conferencing Zealand