Additional Bankruptcy Judges: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, First Session, on S. 1923 ... December 17, 1985 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
13 PETITIONS PERCENT 1981 DISTRICT TOTALS AUTOMATIC STAY AVOIDANCE BY DEBTOR AVOIDANCE BY TRUSTEE BANKRUPTCY CODE bankruptcy court bankruptcy judges bankruptcy judgeships BUSINESS PETITIONS FILED caseload CHAIRMAN CHAPTER 11 CHAPTER CHAPTER 13 CONFIRMATIONS CHAPTER 13 PETITIONS CIRCUIT CLEAR OF LIEN COMMENCED LIEN AVOIDANCE CONTESTED PETITIONS DISCHARGEABILITY OF DEBT ENDED JUNE 30TH Federal Judicial Center FREE AND CLEAR Illinois Iowa Judge DEMASCIO JUDICIAL ACTIVITY Judicial Conference Kentucky LAST CHAPTER 13 LAST PERCENT CHANGE MONTH PERIODS ENDED North Dakota Northern number of bankruptcy NUMBER OF JUDGESHIPS OBJECTION TO DISCHARGE Oklahoma PERCENT NO ASSET PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PERIODS ENDED JUNE PETITIONS PERCENT CHANGE places of holding PRIORITY OF LIEN PROCEEDINGS COMMENCED LIEN PROCEEDINGS PER JUDGESHIP PROCEEDINGS PROCEEDING HOURS PROPERTY BY TRUSTEE RECOVERY OF PROPERTY SALE FREE SHORT CAUSE MATTERS South Carolina Strom Thurmond Tennessee TOTAL PROCEEDINGS COMMENCED TOTAL PROCEEDINGS PROCEEDING TOTAL PROCEEDINGS TERMINATED TRIALS TOTAL TRIALS TWELVE MONTH PERIODS VALIDITY OR PRIORITY Western
Popular passages
Page 299 - Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 US 50, 102 S.Ct.
Page 14 - We note, moreover, that the 1978 Act made at least three significant changes from the bankruptcy practice that immediately preceded it. First, of course, the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy courts was "substantially expanded by the Act." HR Rep. No. 95-595, supra, p. 13 (1977). Before the Act the referee had no jurisdiction, except with consent, over controversies beyond those involving property in the actual or constructive possession of the court. 11 USC § 46(b) (repealed).
Page 9 - IV of the plurality opinion in Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.. 458 US , 102 S.
Page 9 - Title 28 of the United States Code, the Judicial Conference of the United States is statutorily required to 'make a comprehensive survey of the condition of business in the courts of the United States' and to 'submit suggestions and recommendations to the various courts to promote uniformity of management procedures and the expeditious conduct of court business'.
Page 7 - Congress has now determined these positions itself, the committee has devoted a considerable amount of time and effort to the development of a threshold test for evaluating judgeship needs.
Page 9 - Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 US 50 (1982), the Court invalidated a broad grant of jurisdiction to the Article I bankruptcy courts. The plurality found a danger of "'encroachment or aggrandizement' by Congress at the expense of the other branches of government.
Page 2 - S. 1923 in the record. [Aforementioned material follows:] OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR ORRIN G. HATCH Mr. Chairman, at the outset of this hearing, I would like to...
Page 9 - ... this chapter), and any other material factors. The Director shall give consideration to suggestions from any interested parties, including district judges, United States commissioners or officers appointed under this chapter, United States attorneys, bar associations, and other parties having relevant experience or information.
Page 16 - The district courts shall advise their respective councils, stating their recommendations and the reasons therefor; the councils shall advise the conference, stating their recommendations and the reasons therefor, and shall also report to the conference the recommendations of the district courts. The conference shall determine, in the light of the recommendations of the Director, the district...
Page 299 - racing to catch up' with demands for services." On June 18, 1987, in testimony before the Subcommittee on Crime of the House Committee on the Judiciary, the Chairman of the Judicial Conference's Committee on the Administration of .the Probation System said, "...when guideline sentencing takes effect, the probation workload in every court will experience an increase overnight of approximately 20 percent.