Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means
Winner of the 2020 Outstanding Book Award Presented by the Public and Nonprofit Section of the National Academy of Management
Winner of the 2019 Louis Brownlow Book Award from the National Academy of Public Administration
Through in-depth case studies of federal programs and controversial legislation, the authors show that administrative burdens are the nuts-and-bolts of policy design. Regarding controversial issues such as voter enfranchisement or abortion rights, lawmakers often use administrative burdens to limit access to rights or services they oppose. For instance, legislators have implemented administrative burdens such as complicated registration requirements and strict voter-identification laws to suppress turnout of African American voters. Similarly, the right to an abortion is legally protected, but many states require women seeking abortions to comply with burdens such as mandatory waiting periods, ultrasounds, and scripted counseling. As Herd and Moynihan demonstrate, administrative burdens often disproportionately affect the disadvantaged who lack the resources to deal with the financial and psychological costs of navigating these obstacles.
However, policymakers have sometimes reduced administrative burdens or shifted them away from citizens and onto the government. One example is Social Security, which early administrators of the program implemented in the 1930s with the goal of minimizing burdens for beneficiaries. As a result, the take-up rate is about 100 percent because the Social Security Administration keeps track of peoples’ earnings for them, automatically calculates benefits and eligibility, and simply requires an easy online enrollment or visiting one of 1,200 field offices. Making more programs and public services operate this efficiently, the authors argue, requires adoption of a nonpartisan, evidence-based metric for determining when and how to institute administrative burdens, with a bias toward reducing them. By ensuring that the public’s interaction with government is no more onerous than it need be, policymakers and administrators can reduce inequality, boost civic engagement, and build an efficient state that works for all citizens.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
abortion providers Accessed June 21 admin administrative burdens administrative data allow application assistance auto-enrollment BadgerCare beneficiaries burdensome choices citizens compliance costs courts coverage decline Department of Health documentation early voting effects EITC election eligibility employees enrollment evidence example exchange expand face federal government field offices food stamps goal Governor groups health insurance health-care Ibid implementation income increase individuals interactions learning and compliance less limit low-income Medicaid Medicare Advantage Medicare Part D Medigap ment minimum wage negative income tax Obama offer older adults options outreach participation percent plans policymakers political poverty poverty line prescription drug procedures psychological costs reduce burdens reduce learning costs registration Republican requirements restrictions role SNAP benefits Social Security stigma take-up targeted tax preparation third parties tion TRAP laws Trump administration turnout verify voter fraud voter ID laws welfare Wisconsin women women’s health workers