Advance directives in medicine
Chris Hackler, Ray Moseley, Dorothy Vawter, Society for Health and Human Values, Concern for Dying (Association), Arkansas Nursing Home Association
Praeger, 1989 - Health & Fitness - 196 pages
Modern medicine has put a new twist on one of our most fundamental values . . . self-determination. A patient's right to self-determination becomes a poignant and volatile issue in the context of modern life-sustaining technologies. When the benefit of medical treatment is overshadowed by the resulting burdens, treatment may ethically be withdrawn. Patients have the right to make this decision, assuming they still have the capacity to make it. Through advance directives a competent patient can extend his right to consent to or refuse medical treatment indefinitely into the future. Whether in the form of informal oral instructions or formal written documents, advance directives insure patients that their treatment wishes will be carried out. They also alleviate the uncertainty, guilt, and/or fear of legal consequences facing the family and caregivers. This volume is a collection of fourteen essays investigating the advantages and disadvantages of different kinds of directives, the role of professionals in making and honoring them, policy issues that need to be addressed, and future directions which directives may take. Although such documents may be used to request treatment, this volume limits its focus to their more common function . . . the refusal of treatment. Timely and comprehensive, Advance Directives in Medicine provides a stimulating overview of this relevant topic. The papers in this volume were originally presented at a multidisciplinary conference on advance directives. Revised and edited for this text, they address a variety of questions and issues, for instance: What are the individual and societal benefits of advance directives? Does an advance directive tamper with the sanctity of life? Will normalizing directives have an adverse effect on the practice of medicine? Should a patient specify treatments to be withheld within a directive, such as the use of CPR, nutrition, or hydration? What legal sanctions should apply against those who ignore directives? Should directives be used to reduce health care expenditures by insurance companies, Medicare, and Medicaid? What is a physician's role in helping his patient formulate an appropriate directive and when is a patient ready to confront his own mortality?
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
A FRAMEWORK FOR LEGAL ANALYSIS
DO LIVING WILL STATUTES EMBODY
7 other sections not shown
advance directives argue authority autonomy Behavioral Research benefit Best Interests Biomedical and Behavioral California cardiopulmonary resuscitation choices circumstances clinical common law competent Concern for Dying Conroy Conroy's costs court denial discussion durable power elderly Engl Ethical Problems example health care decision-making health care decisions hospital incompetent patients individuals informed consent interpretation issue Jersey Supreme Court Karen Ann Quinlan life-sustaining treatment limits medical treatment Medicine and Biomedical ment moral nasogastric tube natural death acts natural death laws natural death legislation natural death statutes one's Parfit patient's wishes personal identity physicians power of attorney preferences President's Commission principal principal's Problems in Medicine professionals proxy directives questions Reasons and Persons refuse life-prolonging treatment refuse treatment require Richard Lamm right to refuse self-determination society specific standard Study of Ethical Substituted Judgment supra note surrogate terminally ill treatment decisions treatment refusal Utnapishtim values Whittemore Youngner