Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law
American methods of policy implementation and dispute resolution are more adversarial and legalistic when compared with the systems of other economically advanced countries. Americans more often rely on legal threats and lawsuits. American laws are generally more complicated and prescriptive, adjudication more costly, and penalties more severe. In a thoughtful and cogently argued book, Robert Kagan examines the origins and consequences of this system of adversarial legalism. Kagan describes the roots of adversarial legalism and the deep connections it has with American political institutions and values. He investigates its social costs as well as the extent to which lawyers perpetuate it. Ranging widely across many legal fields, including criminal law, environmental regulations, tort law, and social insurance programs, he provides comparisons with the legal and regulatory systems of western Europe, Canada, and Japan that point to possible alternatives to the American methods. Kagan notes that while adversarial legalism has many virtues, its costs and unpredictability often alienate citizens from the law and frustrate the quest for justice. This insightful study deepens our understanding of law and its relationship to politics in America and raises valuable questions about the future of the American legal system.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accident adjudication administrative adversarial legalism’s AFDC agencies AMERCO American adversarial legalism American legal American tort appeals attorneys beneﬁts bureaucracies Caltrans Century Freeway claims class actions companies compared compensation Congress conviction corporate costly costs countries damages decisions defendant’s defendants defense lawyers Democratic difﬁcult disputes dredging economically advanced democracies enforcement environmental European federal courts ﬁle ﬁled ﬁnance ﬁnd ﬁrms ﬁrst ﬁve funding Germany governmental hierarchical implementation inefﬁcient inﬂuence injuries Japan Johnson judicial judiciary jury trial Kagan lawsuits lawyers legalistic legislatures less liability litigation malpractice McCleskey McCleskey’s medical malpractice ment million Oakland ofﬁcers ofﬁces ofﬁcials parties penalties percent plaintiffs plea bargaining political Port of Oakland pretrial pretrial discovery prison procedures programs prosecutors reﬂects reform regulation responsive signiﬁcant signiﬁcantly social statutes tion tort law tort reform tort system trafﬁc U.S. District Court U.S. Supreme Court United unpredictable versarial victims violations welfare