Aetna Portland Cement Company, Et Al. ... [et Al.] ...: Respondents-petitioners, Vs. Federal Trade Commission, Complainant-respondent. No. 8360, No. 8361, No. 8410. On Petitions for Review of Order of Federal Trade Commission. Appendix A to Brief of Respondents-petitioners. A Topical Digest of the Evidence ...

Front Cover
Donovan Leisure Newton & Lumbard, 1945 - Portland cement
0 Reviews

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

IN
1401
VIBDistrict No 1 continued
1416
VIEDistrict No 4
1419
VIJDistrictNo 9
1424
Loading Facilities for and Mill Problems
1430
Comparative Cost of Truck and Rail Delivery
1439
General I450
1453
The 15 Differential
1485
_
1726
Effect of Water Delivery on Mill Nets
1732
Part VIIIDiversion of Cement in Transit
1739
B Objections to Diversions by Manufacturers
1741
Declarations of Diversions as an Unfair Trade
1757
E Denials of Agreement as to Diversions
1777
B Portland Cement Association
1787
Cement Manufacturers Protective Association
1794

APPENDIX A
1500
NBA Code Price Filing
1525
RailroadProducer Interviews Subsequent
1542
The January 7 1932 Meeting in Philadelphia
1551
Other Dealer Activities in 1931
1557
Background of RailroadProducer Short Haul
1570
April 81932
1584
J Discontinuance by Producers
1590
K Reasons Given by Producers fob Discontinuance
1625
Aetna and Hubon
1667
19321936
1673
Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of Michi
1694
Part VITruck Delivery
1705
Part IXEarly Trade Association
1797
Membership
1808
B The Institutes Documents
1824
As Amended After the Schechter Decision
1834
Part XIThe Cement Institutes Services
1875
was Rendered
1901
Effect on Market Prices
1921
Institute and Other Statistics
1927
Committee Activities
2012
Part XIIThe NRA Cement Code
2099
t The Code Authority and the Cement Institute
2118
Part XIIIAetnas Practices and the Cree Incident
2167
B Aetnas Management and Crees Discharge
2200

Other editions - View all

Bibliographic information