Aetna Portland Cement Company, Et Al. ... [et Al.] ...: Respondents-petitioners, Vs. Federal Trade Commission, Complainant-respondent. No. 8360, No. 8361, No. 8410. On Petitions for Review of Order of Federal Trade Commission. Appendix A to Brief of Respondents-petitioners. A Topical Digest of the Evidence ...
Donovan Leisure Newton & Lumbard, 1945 - Portland cement
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Propositions of Law Belied On
Atchison Topeka Santa Fe Railway Co
No Agreement or Conspiracy Has Been
24 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
activities agreement alleged argument base mill base prices basing point system buyers cement industry Cement Institute Cement Manufacturers cement mills charge Clayton Act Code Authority Code of Ethics Commis Commission counsel Commission's brief competition competitors complaint Consolidated Edison cost customers dealers delivered prices delivery destination digested in App Donovan f.o.b. mill prices fact Fdgs Federal Trade Commission freight rate books Government illegal incompetent evidence inference land grant rates Lehigh lower price main brief ment multiple basing point multiple basing-point N.R.A. Code nationwide conspiracy non-base mills Pacific Coast Paragraph Portland Cement Company price discrimination price leadership price quotations pricing methods proof provisions purchasers record referred respondents Robinson-Patman Act Section 2(b sell cement seller seven peti seven petitioners shipments shows sion Staley Statement of Points supra Supreme Court territory testified testimony tion tioners trucking uncontradicted undisputed evidence uniformity United Victorville XVII