What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Overview of the Selection Application and Funding
Funding Allocation Decisions Not Clearly Documented
4 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
activity plan Administrator of FAS Almonds 301 amount apply for TEA Assn Association1 Avocado brand identified promotion California Raisin cash commodity divisions Compliance Review Staff consumer promotion Cooperator Market Development Cooperator program eligible FAS Management Controls FAS Needs TEA FAS officials fiscal year 1986 Food Security Foreign Agricultural Foreign Agricultural Service funding allocation decisions funding decision gram Implementation Lacks Accountability increased market development activities Market Development program Marketing Programs ment million minimum funding level Needs TEA Evaluation nonprofit percent potential Program Evaluation Section Program Implementation Lacks receiving TEA funds reimbursement Secretary of Agriculture section 301 sumer Sunkist Growers Targeted Export Assistance TEA activities TEA application TEA Evaluation Guidelines TEA guidelines TEA participants TEA program agreement TEA Program Implementation TEA projects TEA/EIP TEA/HVEIP technical assistance third-party contribution tion trade associations trade servicing types of market U.S. agricultural commodities U.S. exports unfair trade practice USAEDC