Alas, Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary PsychologyIn recent years, the claims of genetics and evolutionary psychology to explain and indeed legislate on the human condition have been loudly trumpeted in a host of popular books. Genes are said to account for almost every aspect of our lives. Evolution is supposed to explain alleged human universals, from male philandering and female coyness to children's dislike of spinach. There are even claimed to be genes that account for differences between people -- from sexual orientation to drug addiction, aggression, religiosity, and job satisfaction. It appears that Darwin, at least in the hands of his popularizers, has replaced Marx and Freud as the great interpreter of human existence. Biologists, social scientists, and philosophers have begun to rebel against this undisciplined approach to their different understandings of the world, demonstrating that the claims of evolutionary psychology rest on shaky empirical evidence, flawed premises, and unexamined political presuppositions. In this groundbreaking book, Hilary Rose and Steven Rose have gathered the leading and outspoken critics of this fashionable ideology in a shared and uniquely cross-disciplinary project. Contributors range from biologists Stephen Jay Gould, Gabriel Dover, Patrick Bateson, and Anne Fausto-Sterling; to anthropologists and sociologists Dorothy Nelkin, Tim Ingold, Tom Shakespeare, and Ted Benton; to philosopher Mary Midgley and cultural critics Barbara Herrnstein Smith and Charles Jencks. The result of this joint work, Alas Poor Darwin, is a sharply engaged, accessible, and highly entertaining critique of evolutionary psychology's tenets. What emerges is a new perspective that challenges the reductionism ofevolutionary psychology and offers a richer understanding of the biosocial nature of the human condition. |
What people are saying - Write a review
Alas, poor Darwin: arguments against evolutionary psychology
User Review - Not Available - Book VerdictThe pendulum of scientific opinion has swayed over the "nature vs. nurture" issue back and forth several times throughout the last century. Now, with the human genome mapped and new clues being found ... Read full review
Contents
Hilary Rose and Steven Rose | 1 |
Impulse in Evolutionary Psychology | 17 |
Charles Jencks | 33 |
Copyright | |
14 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Alas Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary Psychology Hilary Rose,Steven Rose No preview available - 2010 |
Common terms and phrases
animal argue argument basic behavior patterns biological biologists brain Cambridge chapter Charlene Spretnak Charles Jencks claims cognitive complex concept Consilience constructed contemporary context cultural Darwin Darwin's Dangerous Idea Darwinian Dawkins's Dennett developmental disability disciplines E. O. Wilson ecological environment environmental evolutionary psychology evolutionary theory evolved example experience explain female feminist functions gender genetic geneticists genome genotype Hilary Rose human behavior human evolution human nature idea impairment individual innate instinct interactions John Tooby language learning Leda Cosmides living London male means mechanisms memes ment mental modular modules molecular moral mutations natural selection organisms particular phenotype political population problem protein religion replication reproductive Richard Dawkins Runciman scientific scientists Selfish Gene sexual social sciences society sociobiology sociology spandrels species Steven Pinker Steven Rose structures theorists tion understanding units University Press walking women York