Altered Inheritance: CRISPR and the Ethics of Human Genome Editing
With the advent of CRISPR gene-editing technology, designer babies have become a reality. Françoise Baylis insists that scientists alone cannot decide the terms of this new era in human evolution. Members of the public, with diverse interests and perspectives, must have a role in determining our future as a species.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
acceptable advocates alternatives American babies believe benefit better bioethicists Bioethics birth broad called changes clinical concerns consensus consent created CRISPR cultural debate decision deliberation designer develop discussion disease effective eggs embryos Engineering enhancement ethics example experts faulty fertility future gene genetic genetic disease genetic modification germline genome editing global goal governance harms heritable human genome human embryos human genome editing Huntington’s disease important improve increase individual inherited initial interest involving issue knowledge limited live March means modified moral moratorium Nature options Organization parents participants patients percent persons policymaking political possible potential practice problems prospective questions reason reproductive requires responsible result risk role scientific scientists selection serious social societal somatic cell suggested Therapy traits transfer treatment understanding United University values women