America Debates Privacy versus Security
This title is a balanced exploration of the debate on privacy versus security in post-9/11 America. An accessible examination of the Constitutional definition of the right to privacy is included, and scholars weigh in on the debate. Increased surveillance is discussed, with a look at whether it has paid off so far, and if it is worth the cost.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
activities agency responsible airport American citizens American Civil Liberties Arab Asian Muslims authorities Bill of Rights bomb Central Intelligence Agency Civil Liberties Union commit a crime danger Department of Justice detained document Edgar Hoover electronic engaged in terrorism events of 9/11 evidence expanded federal law enforcement foreign agents Foreign Intelligence Surveillance free speech freedom government law enforcement Guantanamo Bay Homeland Security illegal Image Search immigrants intelligence information Intelligence Surveillance Act Internet issues law enforcement agencies legitimate Middle Eastern monitor National Security Agency National Security Letters no-fly offender profiling organizations Patriot Debate potential terrorists powers granted powers of surveillance provisions racial profiling reauthorization requires right to free right to privacy rights of Americans Schneier specific Surveillance Act FISA suspected suspicious targeted Terrorism This section terrorist attacks Title U.S. Constitution U.S. Department U.S. government U.S. Supreme Court United USA PATRIOT Act violated World Trade Center