An Analysis of Thinking and Research about Qualitative Methods
Written for social science scholars who want to learn more about the qualitative way of thinking, this book addresses the full continuum of issues about the qualitative methodologies. At one end of that continuum are the deeply philosophical concerns of ontology and epistemology. At the other -- concrete -- end of that continuum are the practical issues of what is considered evidence: How does one go about gathering evidence? Where, when, and how does one analyze evidence? What are the alternative ways of dealing with tone and voice in writing qualitative research? The attention to practical, concrete issues makes this book useful as a handbook providing a great deal of vital information to scholars who want a guide to making decisions as they navigate their research questions through the qualitative realm.
Uniquely qualified to write such a book, Potter has earned PhDs in both qualitative methods (with a concentration in linguistics and field studies) and in quantitative methods (with a concentration in social science theory and statistics). The book is not an ideological argument that glorifies one system of thinking while attempting to persuade the reader that other systems of thinking are bankrupt. Rather, the book presents a respectful, balanced analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the qualitative approach.
The book builds to a controversial final chapter entitled "Is Convergence a Possibility?" in which Potter synthesizes a conclusion from his analysis of a wide range of qualitative studies across three broad topic areas -- text focused research, audience focused research, and institution focused research -- and across seven major qualitative methodologies -- ethnography, ethnomethodology, reception study, ecological psychology, symbolic interactionism, cultural studies, and textual analysis. His conclusion is that not only is there a possibility of a convergence between qualitative and quantitative approaches, but that the convergence has already happened.
The book includes an appendix in which 95 books and articles using the qualitative approach are abstracted and analyzed to illustrate key points of methodology and methods. It also includes subject and author indexes.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
FOUNDATIONS 1 Whether to Enter?
A Potpourri of Definitions
Issues of Belief
The Qualitative Methodologies
The Qualitative Phenomenon
Nature of Qualitative Evidence
Issues of Evidence Gathering
Issues of Writing
ILLUSTRATIONS OF DECISION MAKING
An Illustration of Decision Making in a Qualitative Analysis
External Critique of Qualitative Theory Foundational Issues
Critique of Qualitative Research
Is Convergence a Possibility?
Abstracts of Writings Used in Interpretive Analysis
Other editions - View all
activity Altheide analyzed argued argument assumptions audience axioms behavior belief chapter communication conceptual leverage construct context contrast critical cultural studies data gathering decisions definition developed discourse discourse analysis ecological psychology elements empirical empiricism epistemological ethnography ethnomethodology evidence examined example exist explanation facets feminist focus focuses generalizability grounded theory hermeneutic human ideas ideology illuminate important individual interaction interpretation interviews issues J. A. Anderson Jankowski Kate and Allie Lindlof look mass media meaning methodologies methods myth narrative nature numbers objective observations ontological participant observation patterns perspective phenomenology phenomenon position positivist presented production programs purpose qualitative approach qualitative research qualitative scholars qualitative theoreticians quantitative question reader reading reality reception study sample scientific scientists self-reflexivity sitcoms situation comedies soap operas social science structure subjective symbolic interactionism television texts textual analysis theory tion types understanding validity variables viewers writing