An Assessment of the Science Proposed for the Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory (DUSEL)
Ad Hoc Committee to Assess the Science Proposed for a Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory (DUSEL), Board on Physics and Astronomy, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council
National Academies Press, Feb 16, 2012 - Technology & Engineering - 125 pages
According to the big bang theory, our Universe began in a state of unimaginably high energy and density, contained in a space of subatomic dimensions. At that time, unlike today, the fundamental forces of nature were presumably unified and the particles present were interacting at energies not attainable by present-day accelerators. Underground laboratories provide the conditions to investigate processes involving rare phenomena in matter and to detect the weak effects of highly elusive particles by replicating similar environments to those once harnessed during the earliest states of the Earth. These laboratories now appear to be the gateway to understanding the physics of the grand unification of the forces of nature.
Built to shield extremely sensitive detectors from the noise of their surroundings and the signals associated with cosmic rays, underground facilities have been established during the last 30 years at a number of sites worldwide. To date, the United States' efforts to develop such facilities have been modest and consist primarily of small underground laboratories. However, the U.S. underground community has pushed for larger underground facilities on the scale of major laboratories in other countries. An Assessment of the Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory (DUSEL) addresses this matter by evaluating the major physics questions and experiments that could be explored with the proposed DUSEL. Measuring the potential impact, this assessment also examines the broader effects of the DUSEL in regards to education and public outreach, and evaluates the need associated with developing U.S. programs similar to science programs in other regions of the world.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
2 Description of Underground Facilities
3 Science Assessments
4 Impacts of a National Underground Facility
Statement of Task
Biographies of Committee Members
Survey of the Principal Underground Laboratories
Other editions - View all
0nbb decay antineutrinos antiparticles argon assessment background baseline biosciences Cherenkov detector co-located committee cosmic ray CP violation dark matter experiment Deep Underground Science depth detection dark matter direct detection dark double-beta decay experiments electron energy experimental faults Fermilab flavor fluid fracture geosciences Gran Sasso Homestake impact infrastructure Install interactions Kamioka laboratory space LBNE lepton lepton number long-baseline neutrino experiment long-baseline neutrino oscillation low-energy Majorana particles measurements ments microbial neutrino mass neutrino oscillation experiment neutrino physics neutrinoless double-beta decay neutron nuclear astrophysics nuclear cross sections nuclear physics observations particle and nuclear particle physics physics communities physics experiments processes proposed DUSEL program proton decay quarks scale sensitivity signal SNOLAB solar neutrinos Soudan Standard Model stewardship subsurface engineering Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Super-Kamiokande supernovas supersymmetry techniques tion U.S. scientists underground experiments underground facility underground laboratory underground research facility United water Cherenkov detector WIMPs