What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT AND EXPERIMENTAL
Selection of Subjects
7 other sections not shown
Abnormal and Social accidents Agree2 Strongly agree1 Agree4 Undecided3 Disagree2 analysis of variance atti attitude change automobile Bartlett's Test behavior Brody cards classroom criterion critical persons critical subjects Disagree2 Strongly disagree1 Disagree4 Undecided3 Agree Driver Attitudes driver education students experiment factors group decision group norm high school Homogeneity of Variance hypothesis indicated individual Iowa State College Journal of Abnormal low scores manipulating the Q-Sort mean attitude scores measure ments methods null hypothesis obtained value platykurtic positive attitude modification post-final test Psychological Statistics Q-Sort statements reference groups Residual safe driving Safety Education Safety Research Review Santa Clara County SCORES FINAL TEST scores of critical Scores Pre-Test second experimental condition Siebrecht Attitude Scale Social Psychology speed Strongly agree Strongly disagree Table TEST AND POST-FINAL third experimental condition tion Traffic Safety Research trials tude Undecided3 Agree2 Strongly Undecided3 Disagree Undecided3 Disagree2 Strongly VARIANCE OF SCORES York University