What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3 other sections not shown
30 Millisecond Duration 500 millisecond ability of listeners acoustic affricate Ampex analysis of variance Appendix articulation articulatory aspiration portion burst and aspiration cavity coarticulation comparison between durations Comparisons between Listeners confusion matrices consonant-duration Consonants x Durations copies cues for vowel degradation discrimination task Doctor of Philosophy effect electronic switch eq 3f eq 3t evaluation fifteen millisecond duration Figure fixed effect model following vowel four consonants frication fricative full length function of duration given consonant Iconix iiesaouu iiesaouu iiesaouu indicates intended stimuli interaction listener five listener transcribed listener was given manner of articulation Mattingley Millisecond Duration iiesaouu Minimum significant oscilloscope parallel transmission perception phonemes plosive burst presented procedure Scheffe Analysis score segments shorter durations signal six listeners sixty millisecond Sonagrams source of variance stop-plosive syllables Table talker-duration thirty milliseconds three talkers training tasks triads unvoiced plosive voiced portion vowel identification vowel pair vowel samples vowels associated