Anatomy of Censorship: Why the Censors Have it Wrong
Bringing together diverse disciplines such as literary and legal history, modern psychology and contemporary feminism, Anatomy of Censorship sorts out the many confusing explanations and often misleading justifications for censorship to reveal the underlying conditions and motivations that lead to the suppression of various forms of communication. It explains why censors are notoriously incapable of identifying what defines obscene, immoral or illicit expression and how they actually profit from this failure on their part. It shows how censors ultimately aim not to define expression, but people: how they use censorship to stigmatize classes of people as more prone to corruption and depravity, and how they thereby seek to protect the authority of the few rather than, as they falsely claim, the morality of the many. Above all, it offers a timely critique of the most seductive and bogus justification for censorship: that expression has the capacity to cause actual harm. It shows how the law and the censor conspire to foster this unsupported fabrication in the face of overwhelming evidence that no causal link between expression and harm has ever been discovered.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Problem of Definition
A Matter of Class
The Question of Harm and the Evidence for It
Why Opinions Are Censored
accept actual harm Andrea Dworkin art and literature art or literature bad books behavior believe Bernard Arcand blasphemy Catherine MacKinnon causes harm censors censorship law century characteristics Chuang-tzu citizens claim common sense Comstock concern constitutes conviction corrupt crime criminal define depravity Dworkin Edmund Curll effects enforcement evidence of harm evil exist experience fact feminism feminists Hicklin test human ideas ideology illicit expression immoral indecent individuals judges juries klismaphilia MacKinnon matter means Meese Commission Michelson-Morley experiment moder modern censorship moral nature noted obscene material obscenity law offence opinions perhaps persons Plato pornography posses Potter Stewart prejudice prior restraints problem produce proof psychotics punish question rape reason recognize regarding reliable evidence religion religious responses Robin Morgan rule scientific evidence secular seek simply social society statements stipulative definitions tend things true truth violence women words wrong