Ancient Laws and Contemporary Controversies: The Need for Inclusive Biblical Interpretation
The Ten Commandments condone slavery, and Deuteronomy 22 deems the rape of an unmarried woman to injure her father rather than the woman herself. While many Christians ignore most Old Testament laws as obsolete or irrelevant-with others picking and choosing among them in support of specific political and social agendas-it remains a basic tenet of Christian doctrine that the faith is contained in both the Old and the New Testament. If the law is ignored, an important aspect of the faith tradition is denied. In Ancient Laws and Contemporary Controversies, Cheryl B. Anderson tackles this problem head on, attempting to answer the question whether the laws of the Old Testament are authoritative for Christians today. The issue is crucial: some Christians actually believe that the New Testament abolishes the law, or that the Protestant reformers Luther, Calvin, and Wesley rejected the law. Acknowledging the deeply problematic nature of some Old Testament law (especially as it applies to women, the poor, and homosexuals), Anderson finds that contemporary controversies are the result of such groups now expressing their own realities and faith perspectives. Anderson suggests that we approach biblical law in much the same way that we approach the U.S. Constitution. While the nation's founding fathers-all privileged white men-did not have the poor, women, or people of color in mind when they referred in its preamble to "We the people." Subsequently, the Constitution has evolved through amendment and interpretation to include those who were initially excluded. Although it is impossible to amend the biblical texts themselves, the way in which they are interpreted can-and should-change. With previous scholarship grounded in the Old Testament as well as critical, legal, and feminist theory, Anderson is uniquely qualified to apply insights from contemporary law to the interpretive history of biblical law, and to draw out their implications for issues of gender, class, and race/ethnicity. In so doing, she lays the groundwork for an inclusive mode of biblical interpretation.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The View from the Other Side
Engaging Liberationist Critiques
4 Jesus Paul the Law and Inclusive Biblical Interpretation
5 The Protestant Reformers and Inclusive Biblical Interpretation
6 Biblical Authority and the Ethics of Biblical Interpretation
Other editions - View all
Abingdon Press African American ancient argues Barbara Jordan Beasley Bible biblical authority biblical canon biblical laws biblical texts book of Esther book of Ruth Calvin Canaanites canon Christ Christian church Commandments Commentary contemporary context Corinthians cultural Deut Deuteronomy divine dominant Dube excluded faith communities female Feminist Fortress Press gender God’s Grand Rapids heterosexual homophobia homosexuality human Ibid Ideology Inclusive Biblical Interpretation Israelite italics Janzen Jesus Jewish Jews John Calvin John Knox Press John Wesley Judaism liberationist Louisville Luther male means Mona West mythical norm Nashville Old Testament Old Testament Ethics one’s Orpah paradigm patriarchal Paul Paul’s perspective Pharisees poor Postcolonial privileged prophetic Protestant reformers race reading reformers rhetoric Ruth and Esther Scripture sexual Sheffield Academic Press slave slavery social story subordinate T&T Clark Ten Commandments Theology tion today’s tradition University Press violence Walter Brueggemann Wesley’s Westminster John Knox woman women Word York