Animal, Vegetable, or Woman?: A Feminist Critique of Ethical Vegetarianism
Kathryn Paxton George challenges the view held by noted philosophers Tom Regan and Peter Singer and ecofeminists Carol Adams and Deane Curtin who assume the Principle of Equality to argue that no one should eat meat or animal products. She shows how these renowned individuals also violate the Principle of Equality, because they place women, children, adolescents, the elderly, and many others in a subordinate position. She reviews the principal arguments of these major ethical thinkers, offers a detailed examination of the nutritional literature on vegetarianism, and shows how this inconsistency arises and why it recurs in every major argument for ethical vegetarianism. Included is her own view about what we should eat, which she calls feminist aesthetic semi-vegetarianism. "
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
adolescents adult male aesthetic anemia animal products animal rights anorexia nervosa argue arguments for ethical Aristotle beliefs bias body burdens calcium Carol Adams chapter choose claim concerns context contextual moral vegetarianism culture Curtin dairy products dietary differences disease domination Donovan Dwyer and Loew ecofeminist elderly ethical vegans ethical vegetarianism example female feminism feminist aesthetic feminist ethics gender healthy personhood individual infants intake interests iron deficiency iron deficiency anemia killing live male physiological meat eating milk moral arguments moral community moral vegetarianism nonhuman animals nonviolence nutrients nutritional osteomalacia osteoporosis pain percent person Peter Singer pregnant protein reasons Regan reject Research Council 1989b risk social society species studies suffering supplements tarianism tion traditional moral theory Twigg utilitarian vegan diets vegan ideal vegan or vegetarian vegan women vegetarian diets virtue ethics virtuous vitamin B12 vulnerable wrong zinc