Animal minds and human morals: the origins of the Western debate
"They don't have syntax, so we can eat them." According to Richard Sorabji, this conclusion attributed to the Stoic philosophers was based on Aristotle's argument that animals lack reason. In his fascinating, deeply learned book, Sorabji traces the roots of our thinking about animals back to Aristotelian and Stoic beliefs. Charting a recurrent theme in ancient philosophy of mind, he shows that today's controversies about animal rights represent only the most recent chapter in millennia-old debates.
Sorabji surveys a vast range of Greek philosophical texts and considers how classical discussions of animals' capacities intersect with central questions, not only in ethics but in the definition of human rationality as well: the nature of concepts; how perceptions differ from beliefs; how memory, intention, and emotion relate to reason; and to what extent speech, skills, and inference can serve as proofs of reason. Focusing on the significance of ritual sacrifice and the eating of meat, he explores religious contexts of the treatment of animals in ancient Greece and in medieval Western Christendom. He also looks closely at the contemporary defenses of animal rights offered by Peter Singer, Tom Regan, and Mary Midgley.
Animal Minds and Human Morals sheds new light on traditional arguments surrounding the status of animals while pointing beyond them to current moral dilemmas. It will be crucial reading for scholars and students in the fields of ancient philosophy, ethics, history of philosophy, classics, and medieval studies, and for everyone seriously concerned about our relationship with other species.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
the denial of reason to animals
Perceptual content expanded
18 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate
Limited preview - 1995
ancient animal sacrifice appearance phantasia argument Aristotelian Aristotle Aristotle Pol Aristotle's Arius Didymus ascribed assent Augustine City belief doxa Cambridge capacities century Chapter Christian Chrysippus Cicero Cicero Fin cited concepts conceptualisable contrast denial deny dianoia Didaskalikos Diogenes Laertius Lives discussion emotion Empedocles Epicureans Epicurus Ethics example Fortenbaugh Galen Greek Hermarchus Hierocles human rights Iamblichus Ibid idea injustice intellect involves irrational justice killing lack Lactantius London memory moral Myles Burnyeat natural Neoplatonists non-rational oikeiosis Oxford passage Paul Vander Waerdt perceiving perception perceptual appearance Philo de Animalibus Philodemus philosophical Philosophy of Mind plants Plato Platonist Plotinus Plutarch Plutarch Sollertia Porphyry Abstinence Porphyry's Proclus propositional Pythagoras rational reason logos recognise relevant Republic Richard Sorabji says Seneca Ep sense Sextus PH Simplicius species Stobaeus Stoic theory Stoics texts Theaetetus Theophrastus thing thought Timaeus translated transmigration treat treatise universal