Antitrust Policy Issues

Front Cover
Nova Publishers, 2006 - Business & Economics - 185 pages
0 Reviews
The goal of antitrust advocates is to increase the role of competition, assure that competition works in the interests of consumers, and challenge abuses of concentrated economic power in the American and world economy. Antitrust policies were first enacted during the great robber baron era of American economic history. Men, such as Rockefeller and Carnegie, were forced to split up their companies that monopolised the oil and steel industries of America. Ever since that time, antitrust policies have worked to avoid similar situations. These policies cannot always be effective because of developing circumstances. This book presents studies of different antitrust policies and how they adapt to a rapidly changing economic landscape.

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


General Overview of United States Antitrust Law
PriceConcentration Studies There You Go Again
Price Gouging the Antitrust Laws and Vertical Integration How They Are Related
Legal Fit of The Microsoft Problem Antitrust or Copyright?
Merger and Antitrust Issues in Agriculture Statutes and Agencies
An Antitrust Primer for Federal Law Enforcement Personnel Competing Ways Towards International Antitrust the WTO versus the ICN
Antitrust in Ukraine
Event Studies for Merger Analysis An Evaluation of the Effects of NonNormality on Hypothesis Testing
Strategic Bundling in Telecommunications and its Antitrust Implications for Intermodal Competition

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 5 - Black explained the appropriateness of, and the need for, per se rules: "[T]here are certain agreements or practices which because of their pernicious effect on competition and lack of any redeeming virtue are conclusively presumed to be unreasonable and therefore illegal without elaborate inquiry as to the precise harm they have caused or the business excuse for their use.
Page 6 - The true test of legality is whether the restraint imposed is such as merely regulates and perhaps thereby promotes competition or whether it is such as may suppress or even destroy competition. To determine that question the court must ordinarily consider the facts peculiar to the business to which the restraint is applied; its condition before and after the restraint was imposed; the nature of the restraint and its effect, actual or probable. The history...
Page 6 - Thus not specifying but indubitably contemplating and requiring a standard, it follows that it was intended that the standard of reason which had been applied at the common law and in this country in dealing with subjects of the character embraced by the statute, was intended to be the measure used for the purpose of determining whether in a given case a particular act had or had not brought about the wrong against which the statute provided.
Page 5 - And as the contracts or acts embraced in the provision were not expressly defined, since the enumeration addressed itself simply to classes of acts, those classes being broad enough to embrace every conceivable contract or combination which could be made concerning trade or commerce or the subjects of such commerce, and thus caused any act done by any of the enumerated methods anywhere in the whole...
Page 2 - ... injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.

Bibliographic information